Integration of automated visual testing with Applitools in the functional testing process

Main Article Content

Liliana Rangel Cano
https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4100-4011

Abstract

Within the framework of functional testing of an information system, visual tests were carried out using Applitools, an automated visual testing tool that facilitates the verification of graphical user interfaces across multiple browsers, devices, and resolutions. This tool uses artificial intelligence to detect visual differences.  The applied methodology confirmed its effectiveness in supporting the testing process, particularly for visual verification and regression testing of graphical interfaces. The tool enables the comparison of software versions or websites with static information; however, its use in applications with dynamic content requires additional customization to avoid false positives. Applitools generates specific baselines for each environment, although a unified baseline can be configured to facilitate the detection of visual inconsistencies resulting from differences in browser rendering. Its implementation involves a learning curve and requires adequate technological resources, as well as consideration of the limitations of the free version. The interpretation of the results depends on the tester's judgment, who determines whether the differences correspond to errors or expected changes. Once the learning curve is overcome, its use significantly reduces execution times compared to manual testing. Furthermore, it is necessary to consider information security, the reusability of the automation, and the advisability of acquiring an institutional license for its use.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Rangel Cano, L. (2026). Integration of automated visual testing with Applitools in the functional testing process. Cuadernos Técnicos Universitarios De La DGTIC, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.22201/dgtic.30618096e.2026.4.1.148
Section
Reportes técnicos
Author Biography

Liliana Rangel Cano, .

.

References

Applitools. (2025). AI-powered Visual Testing Overview. Recuperado de https://applitools.com

Grupo Académico de Inteligencia Artificial Generativa en Educación UNAM. (2025). Recomendaciones para el uso educativo de la inteligencia artificial generativa en la UNAM. Coordinación de Evaluación, Innovación y Desarrollo Educativos (CEIDE). https://www.ceide.unam.mx/index.php/recomendaciones-para-el-uso-educativo-de-la-inteligencia-artificial-generativa-en-la-unam/

International Software Testing Qualifications Board (ISTQB). (2024). ISTQB glossary (Versión 4.6.2). Recuperado de https://glossary.istqb.org/en_US/search?term=&exact_matches_first=true

Myers, G. J., Sandler, C., & Badgett, T. (2011). The Art of Software Testing (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Pressman, R. S., & Maxim, B. R. (2020). Ingeniería de Software: Un enfoque práctico (9a ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Project Management Institute. (2021). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) (7ª ed.). Project Management Institute.

Selenium HQ. (2022). WebDriver [Documentación]. Recuperado de https://www.selenium.dev/documentation/webdriver/

UNESCO. (2021). Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence (SHS/BIO/PI/2021/1). Paris: UNESCO. https:// unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381137

Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. (2023, Octubre). Recomendaciones para el uso de la inteligencia artificial generativa en la docencia [PDF]. Recuperado de https://cuaed.unam.mx/descargas/recomendaciones-uso-iagen-docencia-unam-2023.pdf